This study examines international disorder and its repercussions on the Libyan crisis since 2011. The NATO-led military intervention resulted in the overthrow of the political regime, yet simultaneously opened the door to deep internal conflict and severe political fragmentation. International disorder is understood as the absence of a central authority or effective mechanisms to regulate international relations, which created space for external interventions driven by strategic, ideological, and economic interests. This disorder manifested in Libya through the competition among major powers, the divergent roles of international organizations, and the escalation of regional interventions, all of which intensified political polarization and weakened state institutions. The absence of international consensus further contributed to the continuation of armed conflicts, economic collapse, and security deterioration, turning Libya into a battleground for regional and international forces. The study argues that international disorder has played a decisive role in prolonging and complicating the crisis by obstructing the emergence of a unified international framework for its resolution. Consequently, Libya remains trapped between internal divisions and external interventions, with limited prospects for a comprehensive political settlement. Addressing the Libyan crisis, therefore, requires a dual-track approach based on internal reconciliation and the establishment of an international system capable of managing crises beyond the logic of power struggles. Keywords: Libya, international anarchy, political fragmentation, foreign intervention, great powers, security deterioration, economic collapse.