This research, "Considering Public Interest in Judicial Enforcement Procedures: A Contemporary Jurisprudential Study," examines the principles of public interest in Islamic jurisprudence and the importance of applying them in transactions and observing them in judicial enforcement procedures. This approach aims to serve the public good, protect individual interests, and guarantee the rights of all parties by balancing the rights of creditors and debtors with the public interest. This research employs an analytical approach to study legal texts, a comparative approach to review juristic opinions and interpretations, and an inductive approach to analyze practical applications in contemporary jurisprudence. It addresses the concept of public interest (maslaha mursala), its parameters, and its legal validity, clarifying the limits of its application to ensure it is general, consistent with the five necessities (of Islamic law), and does not contradict definitive texts. This reflects a balance between established legal principles and emerging realities. The research also presents the legal basis for protecting rights in Libyan judicial enforcement procedures, outlining the safeguards that protect both debtors and creditors, while maintaining proportionality and justice. Practically, the application of public interest is manifested in precautionary seizure, travel bans imposed on defaulting debtors, forced sale of mortgaged property, and modern electronic procedures to guarantee the fulfillment of rights and prevent harm. The research affirms that Islamic law preceded positive law in establishing these procedures, and that considering both public and individual interests achieves justice, preserves rights, and legitimizes modern procedures in accordance with the objectives of Islamic law. Keywords: Public interest, judicial enforcement procedures, Islamic jurisprudence.